Aug 30, 2020, 20:01 by frede...@remote.org: > > While it is undeniably a de-facto tourist attraction, and undeniably > offers great views, I think it should probably be changed to > historic=ruins, access=no, and the tracks leading up to it should also > be changed to access=no. > > Opinions? > It seems quite clear that tracks should have correct legal status set. Though I wonder what should be done with viewpoint itself. It is actually viewpoint, it is clearly an attractiom so should we delete tourism=viewpoint? Probably no. tourism=viewpoint + access=no (that will be ignored by all/nearly all data consumers)?
_______________________________________________ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
