I realize this; however, by allowing tj's continued presence in communities we are involved in, we are somewhat supporting his utterly unacceptable actions: namely, theft (of the tbrn contact list, though he says this isn't the case), and spamming (sending out unwanted messenger invites for his organization). While I can't do much about it, I did (and do) feel the need to go on public record as having strong objections to the mode of opperation of this new network, and the activities of tj. Strong enough objections to dial in on a pack mate modem and use webmail with pocket explorer to send emails.
> Hi, > I believe TJ's first message with the "spam," wasn't meant to be taken as > suck, but just that he like others has often done, thought he'd share the > stupidity of the junk mail sender with the list here. > > Thanks, Ray. > > "Falling is easy > It's getting back up that becomes the problem > And if you believe you can find a way out > Then you've solved the problem"(staind, "falling" > ----- Original Message ----- > From: TJ Olsen > To: talk2 > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 10:18 AM > Subject: Re: The Talk2 List Fw: Democrats president cooking. > > > Is this directed at me? > if so, I did not use the tbrn contact list, the only list I migrated in > was > my own, which is my own property. While that was a stupid decision, as > it > was my own property I did not steal. > thanks for your cooperation in this matter > tj > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Samuel Proulx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "talk2" <[email protected]> > Sent: Monday, July 24, 2006 8:44 AM > Subject: Re: The Talk2 List Fw: Democrats president cooking. > > > >I really don't think it's acceptable for people who rip off the tbrn > > contact list for the purposes of spamming to remain in this community. > > Your actions qualify as spam, theft, and misuse of personal data. All > of > > the above are against the law nearly everywhere. If I had more time, > I > > would file a class action against you; your actions are contemptable. > > > >
