Wow, this is the most stoof i've seen on this mail list in a long time. And 
hello new person. 

--- On Sat, 6/13/09, Jonathan Sewell <[email protected]> wrote:

From: Jonathan Sewell <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: The Talk2 List hi
To: "talk2" <[email protected]>
Date: Saturday, June 13, 2009, 1:15 AM

this is true. to be honest i really didn't know most of those other words 
existed. So never used them. Wait your right, i remember someone once saying 
good boof on things and stuff.

K point taken.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Derek Lane" <[email protected]>
To: "talk2" <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 20:08
Subject: Re: The Talk2 List hi


> not really.  Blart and doob perhaps, but the rest haven't held up so well and 
> for possibly many good reasons.
> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jonathan Sewell" <[email protected]>
> To: "talk2" <[email protected]>
> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 10:02 PM
> Subject: Re: The Talk2 List hi
> 
> 
>> yeah but fwoof, boof, doob, blart, shmeeperdooper, ert, etc is cool!.
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "alexander" <[email protected]>
>> To: "talk2" <[email protected]>
>> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 16:37
>> Subject: Re: The Talk2 List hi
>> 
>> 
>>> there are a few of thees expressions that will never die.  but stuff like 
>>> fwoof, boof, doob, blart, shmeeperdooper, ert, etc?  make, them, die! some 
>>> work well as adjectives, but others make no sense what so ever.  Oh and 
>>> must I forget lose?  oh yeah, those were the, uh, days? no I don't think so
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Patrick Perdue" <[email protected]>
>>> To: "talk2" <[email protected]>
>>> Sent: Friday, June 12, 2009 5:10 PM
>>> Subject: Re: The Talk2 List hi
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> Derek Roberts wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> > Mmm, we have another bad booff'ff'ff'ff'ff'ff from , uh , somewhere .
>>>> 
>>>> Yes, one that uses old defunct TBRN expressions that said network regrets 
>>>> and apologizes for, makes use of excessive blindy synth expressions on a 
>>>> public forum in a non-interesting fashion, and writes one-line messages. 
>>>> Yeah, I think you're correct on that. You've definitely found those 
>>>> particular issues, and for that, I heavily congratulate you with a can of 
>>>> mace. After all, what better way is there?
>>>> 
>>>> Note: Talk2 is not Twitter via e-mail, just in case some people get the 
>>>> wrong idea.
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> Did you miss a message?  Well, don't.
>>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/talk2%40andrelouis.com/
>>>> has it for you.  Never miss a Talk2 message again.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Did you miss a message?  Well, don't.
>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/talk2%40andrelouis.com/
>>> has it for you.  Never miss a Talk2 message again.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Did you miss a message?  Well, don't.
>> http://www.mail-archive.com/talk2%40andrelouis.com/
>> has it for you.  Never miss a Talk2 message again.
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> Did you miss a message?  Well, don't.
> http://www.mail-archive.com/talk2%40andrelouis.com/
> has it for you.  Never miss a Talk2 message again. 



Did you miss a message?  Well, don't.
http://www.mail-archive.com/talk2%40andrelouis.com/
has it for you.  Never miss a Talk2 message again.



      

Reply via email to