Oops openmedia.org On 28 December 2015 at 00:12, David Mason <[email protected]> wrote:
> Of the 2 articles, I think the Globe is closer to the mark. > > I largely trust openmedia.ca on this and other IP issues, and they've > been VERY strongly against it. Most recently: > https://openmedia.org/en/tpp-long-road-fairer-copyright > > ../Dave > > On 27 December 2015 at 23:57, John Moniz <[email protected]> wrote: > >> On 12/27/2015 11:04 PM, Alex Volkov wrote: >> >>> Ugh. The article starts with good ol' jingoism and then proceed not to >>> give a single citation of the TPP, condensing to just bunch of >>> paraphrasing taken out of context. Not that the TPP doesn't have its >>> problems but this is really not a good piece of journalism. >>> >>> Planet money gave much better and way less panicky explanation of the >>> TPP -- >>> http://www.npr.org/sections/money/2015/11/06/455055023/episode-662-omg-tpp >>> >>> Alex. >>> >>> >> Reading the comments it seems that many people didn't think very highly >> of Planet Money's journalism on this piece either. >> >> On 26/12/15 08:17 PM, Stephen wrote: >>> >>>> Scary stuff actually. >>>> >>>> The agreement is to benefit existing corporations and stifle new >>>> initiatives. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on-business/rob-commentary/trans-pacific-partnership-is-a-wonderful-idea-for-china/article27939142/ >>>> >>>> >>> --- >>> Talk Mailing List >>> [email protected] >>> http://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk >>> >> >> --- >> Talk Mailing List >> [email protected] >> http://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk >> > >
--- Talk Mailing List [email protected] http://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
