And then there was this: the 86open project.

https://web.archive.org/web/20010424134601/Www.telly.org/86open

⁣

On Aug 2, 2017, 12:35, at 12:35, David Collier-Brown via talk <talk@gtalug.org> 
wrote:
>On 02/08/17 11:44 AM, Lennart Sorensen via talk wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 11:23:05AM -0400, Stewart C. Russell via talk
>wrote:
>>> And almost exactly two decades after Sun/Caldera killed Wabi - the
>>> Windows-16 Application Binary Interface for Solaris/Linux. Funny how
>>> things come around …
>> Remember when Linux had a layer to run x86 BSD binaries?  Now freebsd
>> can run linux binaries instead.  I think it was called iBCS back in
>> the day.
>>
>> http://www.skrenta.com/rt/man/iBCS.9.html
>>
>Yes: intel defined a standard mechanism, which everyone did variations
>on. It was therefor to put in an "interpreter" for different OSs, where
>
>interpreter meant the code that interprets systems calls and dispatched
>
>them.  I remember looking over Drew's shoulder at the code for SCO
>binaries. Solaris 86 had an interpreter for Linux, Linux an interpreter
>
>for Solaris 86.
>
>--dave
>
>--
>David Collier-Brown,         | Always do right. This will gratify
>System Programmer and Author | some people and astonish the rest
>dav...@spamcop.net           |                      -- Mark Twain
>
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>---
>Talk Mailing List
>talk@gtalug.org
>https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
---
Talk Mailing List
talk@gtalug.org
https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to