I think you are conflating physically signing a doc, with
digital signature.
When you use a digital pen to sign a doc, your signature does not matter,
it's completely cosmetic. The doc is signed under the hood electronically
using PKI with a trusted chain based on how you authenticated to the
signing application.



On Wed, Apr 12, 2023 at 4:11 PM D. Hugh Redelmeier via talk <[email protected]>
wrote:

> | From: James Knott via talk <[email protected]>
>
> | The proper way to do digital signatures is with X.509 certificates. When
> I was
> | at IBM, in the late 90s, we used them in Lotus notes. There are some
> public
> | key sources available, but it's not very common outside of large
> | organizations.
>
> Maybe.
>
> The troubles include:
>
> - issuers should take on the responsability to validate what they are
>   vouching for.  It is hard to make this simultaneously useful and
>   inexpensive.
>
> - cert vendors are mostly rent-seeking.  That goes with the territory
>   of being at the top of a hierarch
>
> - X.509 is complicated in ways that are not useful
>
> The PGP web of trust is/was interesting but it doesn't seem to work for
> most people.  Perhaps due to lack of motivation.
> ---
> Post to this mailing list [email protected]
> Unsubscribe from this mailing list
> https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
---
Post to this mailing list [email protected]
Unsubscribe from this mailing list https://gtalug.org/mailman/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to