I'm still using Vultr without any real issues. They have FreeBSD and OpenBSD available as one-click installs:
https://i.imgur.com/uLJlziD.png I really haven't had any issues with them, and the pricing is really nice for little projects where you just need a server "out there" and don't want to spend more than $4/month. Performance is fine (I do have a few VPSs that do some web hosting). The only downside is that they do seem to have frequent maintenance events, but they are very good about sending advance notice (and of course, it indicates some level of competency if they're keeping up with updates/fixes to the hosting and networking stuff). Charles > On Apr 21, 2025, at 3:39 PM, jpb <j...@jimby.name> wrote: > > > Hi Folks, > > I'm doing my once-a-decade survey on hosting providers. Currently > using Netactuate (old RootBSD) and I'm happy with them, but they're a > bit pricey. > > I'm looking to compare pricing on a virtual private server (virtual > server, not bare metal) with 4GB RAM and 60GB disk. These are rough > numbers - I'll consider both requirements up some or down some. > > MUST be willing to let me run FreeBSD, even -CURRENT. > > I'm currently aware of: > > Netactuate > Panix > HiVelocity > Arp Networks > and > OpenBSD Amsterdam (not pursuing since they are OpenBSD only) > > What else is out there ? > > Thanks Everyone! > Jim B. > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > talk@lists.nycbug.org > https://lists.nycbug.org:8443/mailman/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@lists.nycbug.org https://lists.nycbug.org:8443/mailman/listinfo/talk
