Have you asked the reviewers and editors who are pointing out the
errors? While this doesn't answer your Window-Eyes-related question,
it may give you ideas on what the professionals use.
Greg
At 07:05 AM 9/17/2015, you wrote:
The default spell/grammar check that comes with word is not robust enough
for large, professional or academic manuscripts. Word misses a high
percentage of unusual errors including punctuation with narrated and quoted
text in the same sentence. Is anyone aware of a high quality, professional
level tool that works effectively with Window-Eyes?
I have tried both "Grammarly" and "Ginger" but although they work well for
my sighted husband, they are not effective using Window-Eyes. I am getting a
lot of negative comments regarding errors in manuscripts that reviewers and
editors believe should be addressed prior to submission. Any suggestions??
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of
the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
For membership options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/gdaniel%40columbus.rr.com.
For subscription options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
For membership options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
