Unbelievable, his credibility is at zero, only because it cannot be lower.

On Thursday, August 11, 2016, John Farley via Talk <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Vaughan, thank you for that insight into that article.
>
> My own, unreasearched view, is that any free screen reader will not be
> able to complete the full role of tasks that a more professional screen
> reader can.
>
> Although I do not use JAWS, it is not an acronym for Job Access to Work
> with Screen Reader for nothing.
>
> I am a diehard Window-Eyes user and have been for many years, in a
> professional capacity and now as a retired person.
> I would not move away from Window-Eyes without a much better incentive
> than a single review, which it now appears, is not from the most
> knowledgeable of sources.
>
> Community, please take your choice.
>
>
>
> Regards, John
>
> Tel: +44 (0) 1442 259243
> Mob: +44 (0) 7815 056076
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+john_farley <javascript:;>=
> [email protected] <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Vaughan
> Dodd via Talk
> Sent: Wednesday, August 10, 2016 9:11 PM
> To: 'Chris Skarstad'; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
> Subject: RE: Ranking Screen Readers In Windows10 Anniversary Update: The
> Results Will Surprise You!
>
> Thanks for the post.
>
> I do think we should be cautious about this.  Apart from the fact that the
> guy is a teacher - teacher of what and of whom - his credentials are not
> clearly identified.  So his views are just as good or just as bad as any
> one elses.
>
> Many of us use apps not included in his discussion - excel, outlook, other
> mail and spreadsheet applications and so on.  Whilst it is clear that the
> discussion is about Windows 10 anniversary, and as such is narrow in
> context, it is far from complete.
>
> The bias is clear: if it is free - it must be better, and he has only ever
> used JFW of the paid screen readers.
> Microsoft's commitment to accessibility is questonable.  Yes: Narrator has
> made improvements which are long overdue, and there are knowledgeable blind
> people commiting to Narrator.  But - no braille, no ability to configure it
> for specific apps, and so many other shortcomings which Window-Eyes and JFW
> have attempted to resolve over the years.
>
>
>
> The discussion is an important one, as the industry is in a state of
> change.  But: we should just treat the comments for what they are -
> someone's legitimate opinion.
>
>
> Vaughan.
>
>
>
> Please telephone the Regional Disability and Health Team prior to emailing
> or faxing any new referrals.
>
> Vaughan Dodd, Regional Disability Advisor.
>
> Desk2desk: 97187.
> Email: [email protected] <javascript:;>.
> For referrals: email [email protected]
> <javascript:;>.
>
> Our up-to-date desk file is located at:
> http://doogle.ssi.govt.nz/resources/publications/
> reports-research/regional/auckland/auckland-health-
> disability-resources.html
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+vaughan.dodd001 <javascript:;>=
> [email protected] <javascript:;>] On Behalf Of Chris
> Skarstad via Talk
> Sent: Thursday, 11 August 2016 6:27 a.m.
> To: Russ Kiehne; Window-Eyes Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Ranking Screen Readers In Windows10 Anniversary Update: The
> Results Will Surprise You!
>
> No mention of Window-eyes, eh? tisk tisk.
> On 8/10/2016 9:38 AM, Russ Kiehne via Talk wrote:
> > The following article came from
> > https://www.coolblindtech.com/ranking-screen-readers-in-windows10-anni
> > versary-update-the-results-will-surprise-you/
> >
> > He seemed to leave out Window Eyes?
> >
> > Ranking Screen Readers In Windows10 Anniversary Update: The Results Will
> Surprise You!
> >
> > James Oates
> >
> >
> > On  August 9, 2016
> >
> > In this article, I will attempt to review and rank three of the most
> > popular current screen readers that are available at this time. The
> three screen readers were tested on the most recent version of Windows 10
> anniversary update. This is important because one of the screen readers is
> Microsoft�s most recently updated Narrator.
> > Although ranking the screen readers might prove to be quite
> controversial, I think it can also open up a real discussion on which
> screen readers are most accessible, and even the question of accessibility
> can sometimes be up for debate. I do realize that accessibility is
> determined by personal needs and preferences, so I will attempt to define
> the criteria I used for accessibility in this review.
> >
> > What Is Accessibility?
> >
> > Quite simply, I determined that accessibility is the ability to access
> that which needs to be accessed. Also, I take points off accessibility for
> the screen readers that make it difficult to access material by being
> dysfunctional or by making it very difficult to figure out which keystrokes
> need to be used with the material. Some screen readers make you use
> ridiculous key combinations to activate website elements or functions
> within applications. So without further ado, here are the rankings!
> >
> > Number One: Microsoft Narrator!
> >
> > It took me about a day to get used to the screen reader, but once I
> > did, I realized what a powerful tool Microsoft had created and that
> > the company was finally serious about supporting a built-in screen
> > reader for the blind. In fact, the only thing I could find wrong with
> > the screen reader was that it did not work with my braille display. I am
> currently working with Microsoft and HIMS to see if this problem can be
> resolved. Besides that one issue, the screen reader was fully accessible on
> all websites and applications. I tested the screen readers on Microsoft
> Edge, Internet Explorer, Groove Music, Skype, Dropbox, Microsoft Word,
> Audacity, Feedback, and the Settings app. Narrator now uses something
> called scan mode. You can toggle this on and off by pressing caps lock and
> space bar. When scan mode is off, you can tab through active elements, use
> Windows keyboard commands, and navigate by means of your preferred
> preference; such as, items, headings, and paragraphs. When scan mode is on,
> you can navigate through everything on the screen�that includes text,
> website elements, and application controls�by using the tab key, arrowing
> around the screen, or employing letter navigation. How often has your
> screen reader announced; �OK button�. And you are wondering; �What am I
> saying OK to?� When scan mode is turned on, you can just arrow up and read
> the text associated with that button. You do need to toggle scan mode off
> when you want to use keyboard commands such as control P to pause a music
> track or alt F4 to close an application. This was the only screen reader
> that was fully functional using Microsoft Edge. It was also the only screen
> reader that was able to read every active element and all text on each
> website and application. Clearly, hands down, Narrator is the winner!
> >
> > Second-Place Goes to NVDA.
> >
> > NVDA
> > performed mostly well. The problem is it uses a function called browse
> mode that doesn�t actually work at this time. You�re supposed to be able to
> toggle between focus and browse modes by pressing insert plus spacebar.
> It�s supposed to function like Narrator�s scan mode. Because it didn�t
> work, Microsoft Edge was only able to read active elements, not text, on
> the screen. It was also difficult to read text on other applications. Like
> I said before, you want to know what you�re saying �OK� to. Also, there
> were other applications where you had to switch the pain view to see what
> else was on the screen. That�s OK if you know that there are other pains on
> the screen. But if you don�t, you�re missing out on loads of information.
> NVDA is still a fantastic screen reader and the developers of the project
> are working on fixing browse mode. I suspect they will work out the kinks
> very soon. But can they keep up with all the changes and updates coming
> from Microsoft on an almost daily basis?
> >
> > JAWS Finishes in a Distant Third.
> >
> > This wasn�t even close! I don�t even know where to begin! For
> > starters, the JAWS display driver interfered with the Microsoft
> > Upgrade Assistant which is a program that allows customers to download
> > Windows10 Anniversary Update without having to wait for the automatic
> > update. I had to uninstall the Freedom Scientific display driver just to
> download my free copy of Windows 10 Anniversary Update. Next, JAWS does not
> work with Microsoft Edge unless you�re using the touch cursor. This makes
> Microsoft�s primary browser virtually unusable. This is inexcusable and
> unacceptable. JAWS has also come up with some very convoluted keystroke
> combinations to interact with elements on webpages. I also ran into several
> situations where JAWS was incapable of activating navigation bars on
> webpages. I just want to know, are the people at VFO serious about
> accessibility, or just interested in convincing people in enterprise and
> government that they are?
> >
> > Final Thoughts.
> >
> > I really enjoyed the Mark mobile voice that Narrator uses. I was also
> > pleasantly surprised at how quickly the screen reader reacts. I�m now
> > using it as my primary screen reader. I of course will always continue
> > to use NVDA as well. It is an amazing product and will only continue
> > to improve. They have one of the most talented group of developers
> > I�ve ever seen. As for JAWS, I can�t think of one good thing to say. And
> that�s a difficult position for me to take. When I first became a teacher
> 25 years ago, JAWS was the only program that made the digital world
> accessible for me. It was an amazing product, and I�ve always shown a great
> deal of gratitude toward them, but even I have to admit that they�re not
> maintaining their commitment to customers. You don�t know how difficult
> that is for me to say this because I have a great deal of loyalty toward
> the people who helped me when I was younger. I hope the people at VFO and
> Freedom Scientific can turn things around, but most importantly I applaud
> the accessibility team at Microsoft. For years Microsoft has preached
> accessibility but seemed more interested in promoting their own advancement
> within the field of accessibility. The new Microsoft accessibility team is
> finally focusing on their actual customers. What a refreshing change! I
> have also recorded a podcast demonstrating the use and accessibility of
> Windows 10 anniversary update. I hope you give it a listen.
> >
> > The views expressed here are purely my own, and should be taken as such.
> > _______________________________________________
> > Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
> >
> > For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/
> options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/rascal0826%40verizon.net.
> > For subscription options, visit
> > http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> > List archives can be found at
> > http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>
> For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/
> options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/vaughan.dodd001%40msd.govt.nz.
> For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/
> listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/
> private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>
> -------------------------------
> This email and any attachments may contain information that is
> confidential and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended
> recipient, any use, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this
> email and attachments is prohibited. If you have received this email in
> error please notify the author immediately and erase all copies of the
> email and attachments. The Ministry of Social Development accepts no
> responsibility for changes made to this message or attachments after
> transmission from the Ministry.
>
> -------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>
> For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/
> options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/john_farley%40btinternet.com.
> For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/
> listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/
> private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>
> For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/
> options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/krbarry%40gmail.com.
> For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/
> listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/
> private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com



-- 
Sent from Kevin's iPhone.
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to