I have a triple talk USB. I still prefer the Reed Eloquence voice. The triple talk is not as responsive and sounds more robotic. Nonetheless, I feel a bit more secure knowing that I can have speech available even if the sound card goes out. I've never used the double talk. I believe it may be the older version but I'm not sure.

-----Original Message----- From: Casey via Talk
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2016 10:42 PM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Subject: the triple talk USB or the dectalk USB

Hi I am thinking about maybe getting one of these synthesizers.
The triple talk USB or the dectalk USB.
Witch is the better one that will give the fastest response time and
work the best with window-eyes?
now I know it maybe personal choice.
But I know A few of you out hear of used either one of both of these
units so all comments and suggestions are welcome.
And if you like one over the other please tell us why that is.


--
Casey
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/tfairhurst%40kc.rr.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com


-----
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7924 / Virus Database: 4728/13536 - Release Date: 12/04/16
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to