This is a call to arms!
We the people must rise up and overthrow the tyranny of VFO! Window-Eyes
is a martyr imprisoned within the shark's teeth. A civil upheaval and
attempted coup is in order.
We need a strong and driven aquatic dental hygienist to lead us into the
battle for our lives. Any volunteers?
Gomer Pyle, United States Marine corps
On 3/19/2017 3:33 PM, Steve Nutt via Talk wrote:
Hi,
This will never happen, because Window-Eyes assets are owned by VFO.
All the best
Steve
-----Original Message-----
From: Talk [mailto:[email protected]]
On Behalf Of Brandon Miller via Talk
Sent: 17 March 2017 05:39
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Window-eyes wake up call!
Window-eyes developers, have you considered partnering with Nv Access?
At this point, I mean all things considered, why not? From what I heard from
the Nv Access personnel at CSUN, they seem like a nice enough,
knowledgeable, approachable group, I mean have lines of discussion even so
much as been opened up? If not, why not? Has anybody here been able to have
a look at the NVDA training material? From what I've heard, it's not very,
quote unquote, basic, at all. Quite on the contrary! I hear it's rather
comprehensive, and pretty well put together to boot! I think it'd be a real
shame to see all that Gw Micro has worked for and accomplished over the
years to end up being basically for nothing. Would you not agree that would
be a sad thing? One thing that I think could work out to be a mutually
beneficial solution could be for the Window-eyes developers to partner with
the Nv Access group. I mean if Window-eyes is already free for anybody with
Microsoft Office 2010 or later, then perhaps some of the revenue given by
Microsoft per the terms of that agreement could be contributed to the Nv
Access group in return for round table dialog discussions between the
Window-eyes developers and the Nv Access group on how to best move
accessibility forward. Ya know? Thoughts?
Disclaimer: Be advised; It is possible that this communication is being
monitored by the National Security Agency or GCHQ. .
I neither condone, or support, any such policy by any Government authority
that does not comply appropriately as stipulated by the fourth amendment of
the constitution of the United States of America.
Brandon D. Miller
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
For membership options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/steve%40compro
om.co.uk.
For subscription options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
For membership options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/tom.kingston%40charter.net.
For subscription options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
For membership options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
