Hi Vaughan:

Mostly, I see your point and I would aggree, accept that, if VFO works
out a contract with Microsoft which will allow them to create a JAWS
For Office, presumably Window-eyes, and therefore Window-eyes for
office, will be dead so there will only be two free screen readerws.
Also, if WGW Micro created Window-eyes for Office to prevent people
from switching to NVDA, wouldn't that reasoning apply to creating a
JAWS For Office?  Not to say that they will because I highly doubt
that that will happen, but maybe it remains a possibility.
Kevin Huber and

On 3/29/17, Vaughan Dodd via Talk <[email protected]> wrote:
> I think you'll find that VFO will not do this.
>
> Microsoft funded this, under a contractual basis.
>   The contract supporting the Window-Eyes with Office scheme will most
> certainly come to an end.
> The financial backers of VFO are funding the continued development of JFW,
> and they will expect a return on their investment.
>
> The Window-Eyes for Office deal was a response to the increasing user
> support for NVDA.  The dramatic reduction in the addition of new features
> and bug fixes for Window-Eyes is due in part to the deal, and people
> choosing not to purchase Window-Eyes because they had access to  two free
> screen readers.
>
> There is no way that there can be three free screenreaders.
>
>
> Think about it: once a JFW for Office deal is struck with Microsoft, there
> will be clauses - such as - "cannot continue to develop interfaces for
> products from software competitors" and so forth.
>
> Regarding the Orbit thing: emulation of an 18 cell display means you lose
> 10% of the available realestate.  Because the objective of the Orbit project
> is sound - electronic braille to more people - there will be a JFW driver
> soon.  That driver will probably need to be developed by the Orbit
> consortium, rather than VFO. VFO won't throw in a free non VFO braille
> display when you buy JFW.  It will develop deals for discounting its own
> displays.  This is partly why Optelec are part of the group.
>
>
> Vaughan.
>
>
>
> Vaughan.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Talk
> [mailto:[email protected]] On
> Behalf Of Joshua Kennedy via Talk
> Sent: Thursday, 30 March 2017 11:07 a.m.
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: orbit20 display and future of window eyes
>
> and so this is why the vfo group has to just fold window eyes into jaws or
> just give us a free jaws for office option. because for some people NVDA
> does not cut it, and we need something more powerful, yet that is low cost
> or free. a jaws for office would work fine especially if you need to do
> stuff in microsoft office. not to mention jaws works good with the orbit
> reader20 prototype set to refreshabraille18 emulation.
> window eyes does not work with orbit20 at all. come on vfo group let us use
> jaws for free if microsoft office is installed on our machines!
>
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>
> For membership options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/vaughan.dodd001%40msd.govt.nz.
> For subscription options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>
> -------------------------------
> This email and any attachments may contain information that is confidential
> and subject to legal privilege. If you are not the intended recipient, any
> use, dissemination, distribution or duplication of this email and
> attachments is prohibited. If you have received this email in error please
> notify the author immediately and erase all copies of the email and
> attachments. The Ministry of Social Development accepts no responsibility
> for changes made to this message or attachments after transmission from the
> Ministry.
>
> -------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
> and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>
> For membership options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/huber.kevin7%40gmail.com.
> For subscription options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to