I had asked about a keyboard layout and was told they would have to make
sure it didn't conflict with other programs like fusion.
 That was why they didn't do that WE keyboard layout.  
-----Original Message-----
From: Talk [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Tom
Kingston via Talk
Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 7:48 PM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Tom Kingston
Subject: Re: JAWS Software Synthesizer Volume

Butch,
Actually, VFO initially promised Doug they would create a Window-Eyes
keyboard layout and then they reneged on that promise, which is typical and
says a lot about who they are.
And yes, their number one priority since day one has been governmental and
charitable money money money.
I nailed them many years ago for telling the Massachusetts Commission for
the Blind that Open Book, a self-voicing program, required JAWS. 
Needless to say the head of technology was absolutely livid when he
considered how many JAWS licenses they paid for to give Window-Eyes users
Open Book.
Regards,
Tom


On 8/20/2017 6:44 PM, Butch Bussen wrote:
> You are so right, Tom.  When I was a client in Nevada and  for a short 
> time an employee, they pushed Jaws totally.  they bought from cross 
> roads, a division of easter seals and those vendors wined and dined 
> the counselors to convince them to buy their products.  Of course, if 
> any scripting was done, the state paid through the nose .  I know Doug 
> tried to get vfo to do a window-eyes keyboard interface as window-eyes 
> did for jaws, and vfo flat refused.  To me, jaws isn't intuitive at 
> all and I still run window-eyes.  I will do so until it quits working.  
> When that time comes, I may go to a braille-sense or something like 
> that for e-mail and internet.  On Sun, 20 Aug 2017, Tom Kingston via Talk
wrote:
> 
>> You're right, Dennis. VFO bought their biggest competitor. They have 
>> the code. They're not going to give it or sell it to anyone. It's no 
>> different than the countless companies that Apple, Microsoft, Google, 
>> and Facebook  are constantly buying. They either buy them to kill the 
>> competition or because they want the technology. It's very hard for 
>> new startups with new technology today because who can say no when 
>> they've been struggling for years and then one of the aforementioned 
>> giants dangles three-hundred million under their nose, which for you 
>> conspiracy theorists, is *not* what happened with GW Micro.
>>
>> FS may pick and poke at the Window-Eyes code to see if there's 
>> anything they can use as long as none of us can see that it came from 
>> Window-Eyes. That's their egotistical manner of operation. And I'm 
>> not even sure if they care enough to do that. I think the beast is 
>> out of control and they'll never spend the time to reel it back in 
>> unless they realize their life depends on it and it's not too late. 
>> Today iOS or Android is enough for many people to do everything they 
>> want: surf the web, email, social media, music, movies, news, and on 
>> and on. And of course there's the NVDA and up and coming Narrator avenues
as well.
>>
>> Users are not the priority at FS. I've known this for years. But the 
>> little time I've spent with JAWS has really confirmed it big time.
>> I've never in my thirty years of computing seen a less user friendly 
>> non-intuitive user interface. They'd have to be brain-dead not to 
>> know this. Screen readers have gotten more complicated over the 
>> years. And as Doug realized years ago it was time for a new UI. But 
>> it's a considerable project; one that the folks at FS obviously are 
>> not willing to take on. To lifelong JAWS users it defined the norm. 
>> But to anyone else the JAWS UI is a disgrace compared to that of 
>> Window-Eyes, which comparatively speaking is self-explanatory. I now 
>> can see why non-power-users have to simply accept what it is out of the
box.
>> They're not willing to spend days trying to figure out how to make a 
>> simple change in the convoluted labyrinth they call a UI. It's like 
>> buying a home with a thousand rooms and that home has a thousand 
>> doors on its exterior. Virtually nothing is obvious or self-explanatory.
>>
>> And Olusegun? It's virtually impossible to crack a big low-level 
>> program like Window-Eyes. And even if someone could there's no such 
>> thing as porting it over to Android. At best it could be used as a 
>> template for an extremely skilled group of programmers to use as a 
>> guideline. Mobile operating systems like Android do not possess the 
>> inherent ability, programability, or processing power to do half of 
>> what a full blown screen reader can do.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Tom
>>
>>
>> On 8/20/2017 1:37 PM, Dennis Long via Talk wrote:
>>>  They won't give code up.  Come on think that through.  What company 
>>> do you  know that gives code that was a product that was sold for 
>>> profit to just  give it away.
>>>
>>>  -----Original Message-----
>>>  From: Talk [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>>> Sky  Mundell via Talk
>>>  Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 1:19 PM
>>>  To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
>>>  Cc: Sky Mundell
>>>  Subject: RE: JAWS Software Synthesizer Volume
>>>
>>>  They might give the Window-Eyes code up to a company like Humanware.
>>>
>>>  -----Original Message-----
>>>  From: Talk [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>>> Dennis  Long via Talk
>>>  Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 10:04 AM
>>>  To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
>>>  Cc: Dennis Long
>>>  Subject: RE: JAWS Software Synthesizer Volume
>>>
>>>  I'm pretty sure they own the code.  I say this for a few reasons 1 
>>> they  bought AI Squared and their products.  What are their 
>>> products?  WE is one  of those.
>>>
>>>  -----Original Message-----
>>>  From: Talk [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
>>> Sky  Mundell via Talk
>>>  Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 12:46 PM
>>>  To: [email protected]; 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'
>>>  Cc: Sky Mundell
>>>  Subject: RE: JAWS Software Synthesizer Volume
>>>
>>>  I hope it does VFO didn't say anything about owning the Window-Eyes 
>>> code  or  anything.
>>>
>>>  -----Original Message-----
>>>  From: Talk [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of  
>>> Olusegun
>>>  -- Victory Associates LTD, Inc. via Talk
>>>  Sent: Sunday, August 20, 2017 9:06 AM
>>>  To: 'Window-Eyes Discussion List'; 'Dennis Long'
>>>  Cc: Olusegun -- Victory Associates LTD, Inc.
>>>  Subject: RE: JAWS Software Synthesizer Volume
>>>
>>>  Tom, hopefully I'm not being overtly patronizing especially now 
>>> that  Window-Eyes is dead!!  That aside, Window-Eyes is an 
>>> impressive screen  reader whose ageless awareness outshines the sun!  
>>> Maybe--just  maybe--someday, someone will UNSCRAMBLE the Window-Eyes 
>>> code and PORT IT  OVER to Android thus avoiding some crappy nonsense 
>>> on the part of V F O.
>>>  Should that happen, it's glorious days migh yet return again!
>>>
>>>  Sincerely,
>>>  Olusegun
>>>  Denver, Colorado
>>>
>>>
>>>  ---
>>>  This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>>>  https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of 
>>> the  author  and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>>>
>>>  For membership options, visit
>>>  
>>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/skyt%4
>>> 0shaw.ca
>>>
>>>  .
>>>  For subscription options, visit
>>>  http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>>  List archives can be found at
>>>  http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of 
>>> the  author  and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>>>
>>>  For membership options, visit
>>>  
>>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dennis
>>> l1982%40
>>>
>>>  gmail.com.
>>>  For subscription options, visit
>>>  http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>>  List archives can be found at
>>>  http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of 
>>> the  author  and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>>>
>>>  For membership options, visit
>>>  
>>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/skyt%4
>>> 0shaw.ca
>>>
>>>  .
>>>  For subscription options, visit
>>>  http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>>  List archives can be found at
>>>  http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of 
>>> the  author  and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>>>
>>>  For membership options, visit
>>>  
>>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dennis
>>> l1982%40
>>>
>>>  gmail.com.
>>>  For subscription options, visit
>>>  http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>>  List archives can be found at
>>>  http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>>
>>>  _______________________________________________
>>>  Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of 
>>> the  author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>>>
>>>  For membership options, visit
>>>
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/tom.kingston%4
0charter.net. 
>>>
>>>  For subscription options, visit
>>>  http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>>  List archives can be found at
>>>  http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
>> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>>
>> For membership options, visit
>>
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/butchb%40shell
world.net. 
>>
>> For subscription options, visit
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>> List archives can be found at
>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>
>>
>>
> 
_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dennisl1982%40
gmail.com.
For subscription options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to