Your giving it more credit then it deserves.  It doesn't cut into jaws as
much as you claim.

-----Original Message-----
From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail....@lists.window-eyes.com]
On Behalf Of Josh Kennedy via Talk
Sent: Saturday, September 09, 2017 9:40 PM
To: Window-Eyes Discussion List
Cc: Josh Kennedy
Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?

then how does NVDA work the way it does? and how is it so successful?



On 9/9/2017 9:37 PM, Tom Kingston via Talk wrote:
> Your board of directors would not allow you to spend a pile of money 
> to purchase your competitor and then allow you to put that competitor 
> right back in business against you. And no business owner with a drop 
> of sense would want to do it anyway. Businesses like Apple, google, 
> and Microsoft buy a heap of smaller businesses every year. They don't 
> do so to turn around and give them away. FS is no doubt picking 
> through the Window-Eyes code looking for ways to improve JAWS or 
> features to add.
>
> On 9/9/2017 9:19 PM, Josh Kennedy wrote:
>> if I no longer cared about the product then yes I probably would turn 
>> around and just open source it. if the product was no longer 
>> supported by my business I'd just tell people do what you want with 
>> it, we moved on. take it apart, open source it, whatever. we do not 
>> care.
>>
>>
>>
>> On 9/9/2017 9:14 PM, Tom Kingston via Talk wrote:
>>> No. Think about it. If you were in business and bought your number 
>>> one competitor would you turn around and give it away for someone 
>>> else to continue its development?
>>>
>>>
>>> On 9/9/2017 9:01 PM, Josh Kennedy via Talk wrote:
>>>> hi
>>>>
>>>> Is there any possibility since window eyes is no longer supported 
>>>> to get the window-eyes source code make it open source and put it 
>>>> up on the github website? then other developers could keep 
>>>> developing window eyes.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of 
>>> the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>>>
>>> For membership options, visit
>>>
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/joshuakennedy2
01%40comcast.net.
>>> For subscription options, visit
>>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>> List archives can be found at
>>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
>>
>> --
>> sent with mozilla thunderbird
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>
> For membership options, visit
>
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/joshuakennedy2
01%40comcast.net.
> For subscription options, visit
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

--
sent with mozilla thunderbird

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dennisl1982%40
gmail.com.
For subscription options, visit
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to