Agree with you! -----Original Message----- From: Talk [mailto:talk-bounces+dennisl1982=gmail....@lists.window-eyes.com] On Behalf Of Marvin Commerford via Talk Sent: Monday, September 11, 2017 8:59 AM To: Josh Kennedy via Talk Cc: Marvin Commerford Subject: Re: window-eyes open source?
Big surprise! You've clearly demonstrated over time that you want something for nothing. Harping on WE becoming open source has as much chance of being successful as all of us getting sight. This nagging behavior sometimes works for children with exhausted parents but this case is much larger than that. Demonstrate support for the open source concept by supporting projects that use that model. I'm also not happy about what has happened to WE but the sun still comes up every day. I didn't get my way with this situation so it's time to move on. On 9/9/2017 9:37 PM, Josh Kennedy via Talk wrote: > NVDA is fine to use. I like its business model better than VFO's > business model. > > > > On 9/9/2017 10:14 PM, mr. Chikodinaka Nickarandidum Oguledo via Talk wrote: >> your brakeing the law! you court room jude judy or juje patricia >> dimigao in the court room >> >> On 9/9/17, Tom Kingston via Talk <talk@lists.window-eyes.com> wrote: >>> Your question makes absolutely no sense in the context of this >>> discussion. NVDA's business model has no correlation to VFO's >>> ownership of Window-Eyes. >>> >>> >>> On 9/9/2017 9:40 PM, Josh Kennedy wrote: >>>> then how does NVDA work the way it does? and how is it so successful? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On 9/9/2017 9:37 PM, Tom Kingston via Talk wrote: >>>>> Your board of directors would not allow you to spend a pile of >>>>> money to purchase your competitor and then allow you to put that >>>>> competitor right back in business against you. And no business >>>>> owner with a drop of sense would want to do it anyway. Businesses >>>>> like Apple, google, and Microsoft buy a heap of smaller businesses >>>>> every year. They don't do so to turn around and give them away. FS >>>>> is no doubt picking through the Window-Eyes code looking for ways >>>>> to improve JAWS or features to add. >>>>> >>>>> On 9/9/2017 9:19 PM, Josh Kennedy wrote: >>>>>> if I no longer cared about the product then yes I probably would >>>>>> turn around and just open source it. if the product was no longer >>>>>> supported by my business I'd just tell people do what you want >>>>>> with it, we moved on. take it apart, open source it, whatever. we >>>>>> do not care. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 9/9/2017 9:14 PM, Tom Kingston via Talk wrote: >>>>>>> No. Think about it. If you were in business and bought your >>>>>>> number one competitor would you turn around and give it away for >>>>>>> someone else to continue its development? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 9/9/2017 9:01 PM, Josh Kennedy via Talk wrote: >>>>>>>> hi >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Is there any possibility since window eyes is no longer >>>>>>>> supported to get the window-eyes source code make it open >>>>>>>> source and put it up on the github website? then other >>>>>>>> developers could keep developing window eyes. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those >>>>>>> of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For membership options, visit >>>>>>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/joshuakennedy2 01%40comcast.net. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For subscription options, visit >>>>>>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >>>>>>> List archives can be found at >>>>>>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >>>>>> -- >>>>>> sent with mozilla thunderbird >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of >>>>> the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. >>>>> >>>>> For membership options, visit >>>>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/joshuakennedy2 01%40comcast.net. >>>>> >>>>> For subscription options, visit >>>>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >>>>> List archives can be found at >>>>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >>>> -- >>>> sent with mozilla thunderbird >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of >>> the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. >>> >>> For membership options, visit >>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/ochikodinaka%4 0gmail.com. >>> >>> For subscription options, visit >>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >>> List archives can be found at >>> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com >>> >> > _______________________________________________ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/dennisl1982%40 gmail.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com _______________________________________________ Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared. For membership options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com. For subscription options, visit http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com List archives can be found at http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
