PDF documents, or any other file formats on your computer, are 
electronically stored information.


Cameras cannot read electronic documents. They are such constructed, 
they need to "see" things in real, before they can do anything.


All electronic formats, be it music, video, documents or just any 
blah-blah-blah, will have to be processed internally in the computer.


To best illustrate things, may I suggest you think of the camera as the 
"eye" of the computer. Let's at the same time, tell the scanner to be 
the other "eye" of the PC. The CPU, (or processor), the RAM and any 
other electronic inside your computer's physical box - well, let's name 
it the brain. Even so, the hard disk or SSD, which we will compare to 
your "deep memory".


As you well know, your physical eyes cannot "look" inside the brain, and 
perform anything from within your body. Rather, the eyes can feed the 
brain with information, which your brain now can process.


Back to your query. You will need a camera to feed any written or 
physically visible information into the computer. Whatever has already 
been fed into the computer, like an electronically stored document, will 
be non-interesting for the camera, scanner or any further feeding 
equipment. All processing of what you have in your brain, will be done 
by the brain directly. All information already stored on your computer, 
will be processed directly by the computer, and loaded software.


I know, you wanted a quick answer to your question. I just thought it 
might be helpful for you and others, to have a clarified comprehension 
of why the answer is the way it stands.


To jhust elaborate a tiny bit here, let me in very short terms tell you 
how any OCR software works.

First of all, it needs to retrieve some information. It will typically 
leave you the chance of defining whether it should grab some electronic 
document, or if it should contact an external piece of equipment - like 
a camera or a scanner. To the software, it basically does not matter 
whichever way you feed it with information.


Next, it will start to process the information it has loaded into its 
memory. All such electronic information is made up of 0's and 1's, also 
known as pixels. And the software will compare the layout of these, with 
an internal dictionary. The dictionary will be like a tremendous 
collection of stencils. If the OCR finds that a set of dots (or pixels) 
in the received information matches any stencil in the dictionary, it 
will know what character this will represent. It now will "type" this 
character into a virtual document, thereby imitating you pressing a key 
on the keyboard.


Finally, when it has finished the whole loaded information, it will 
present you with the virtually typed document.


For your information, in old times, the stencil-lookup was pretty much a 
one-to-one comparison. That means, it would need a match that would be 
very close to the exact stenciled shape. If it was to recognize anything 
to be the letter O, it would need a set of pixels in a perfect circle.


Modern OCR software has become far mor "inteligent", whatever we want to 
talk about inteligence when comes to silly electronic units like a 
computer. The inteligence is that the OCR no longer will depend on close 
to exact matches. To a very high degree, it might "look" at the 
properties of a scanned character, and base its recognition on the 
results thereof. For instance, it would conclude that a set of pixels 
that resemble two parallel vertical lines, slightly spaced from each 
other, with a horizontal line running just about mid-way up between the 
verticals - all in all will be interpreted as the capitalized letter H.

Likewise, a vertical bar, with a tiny line pointing diagonally out from 
the upper left end, will likely be told to be the number 1.


As you might understand, such propetary comparison will be more 
forgiving, than if you were to compare exact matches. You no longer need 
to define how high the character can be, or what the width should be. 
The OCR can "see" this is the number 9, big or small print, simply by 
recognizing the shape and other properties of the character. This is one 
of the reasons, modern OCR can perform high degrees of faultless 
recognition. In the old days of the 80's, often a number 9, and the 
lower-case G, would be confusingly recognized as either, due to the fact 
that they quite much would resemble similar pixel-patterns.


to improve the OCR recognition, modern OCR software further will hold 
comprehensive dictionaries for spelling, in several languages. It is 
considered very little likely, that any word in English would be:

     log9ing,

so the OCR will recognize this as if it was a common typo, and replace 
the 9 with a g, making the word:

     logging,

which happens to be a validly spelled English word.


Since they now aday do propetary stencilized OCR, they also can perform 
recognition of hand-writing. At least, to a certain degree. Simply by 
attempting to recognize the shape and general makeup of the lines on the 
paper, the OCR will conclude that your droddle "pretty much looks like" 
a given character. By correcting the software whenever it performs the 
wrong recognition, it eventually will "learn" the style of your 
hand-writing. Such correction is what is known as

     training the software.


Hope all of this was of any help and interest to you, or others.

David

On 11/28/2017 6:23 PM, Robert Ringwald via Talk wrote:
> I do not have a smart phone. In order to use the KNFB program to just 
> read PDF's on the computer, do I need a camera? Or can it be done 
> internally within the computer?
>
> Windows 10.
>
>
>
>
> Bob Ringwald piano, Solo, Duo, Trio, Quartet, Quintet
> Fulton Street Jazz Band (Dixieland/Swing)
> 916/ 806-9551
> Check out my performing schedule: www.ringwald.com/schedule.php
> Amateur (ham) Radio Station K6YBV
>
> “If you don't read the newspaper you are uninformed,
> if you do read the newspaper you are misinformed.” -- Mark Twain
>
>
>
> ---
> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>
> _______________________________________________
> Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the 
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.
>
> For membership options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/trailerdavid%40hotmail.com.
> For subscription options, visit 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
> List archives can be found at 
> http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

_______________________________________________
Any views or opinions presented in this email are solely those of the author 
and do not necessarily represent those of Ai Squared.

For membership options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/options.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com/archive%40mail-archive.com.
For subscription options, visit 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/listinfo.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com
List archives can be found at 
http://lists.window-eyes.com/private.cgi/talk-window-eyes.com

Reply via email to