josh its trivial to re-project 4326 to web merc on the fly
Brian On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 07:40 -0500, Josh Doe wrote: > I've been trying to find the discussion or rationale for why EPSG:4326 > is the projection of choice (or only supported projection?), but > haven't had any luck. It seems to me that most imagery will eventually > be consumed in EPSG:3857/900913, though of course not exclusively, so > it seems that would be a better choice. Is there any technical reasons > why EPSG:4326 is preferred, or any statistics on it being more > prevalent? I think the answer to this belongs in the docs. > > Thanks, > -Josh > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > t...@host134.hostmonster.com > http://host134.hostmonster.com/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org _______________________________________________ talk mailing list t...@host134.hostmonster.com http://host134.hostmonster.com/mailman/listinfo/talk_openaerialmap.org
