On Dec 24, 2007 10:35 AM, Frederik Ramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > > > Is there aconsensus to add these to possibilities to the > > access-"transport mode restriction"-list? > > Does that make sense? Both these access restrictions generally come as > "... only" (ways *only* allowed for emergency or farming vehicles), > and I cannot imagine a situation where I would tag "emergency=no"...
Round my way we have lots of roads that have been blocked off to traffic, and have short "cycle gaps" most easily seen on the cycle layer (surprise!) e.g. http://www.gravitystorm.co.uk/osm/?zoom=16&lat=6705665.66502&lon=-23398.725&layers=B00 . Some have removable bollards for emergency access. Some don't. You might want to confirm which ones don't have emergency access with emergency=no (whereas no tag would imply that it hadn't been mapped rather than yes or no). Not that I'm planning on tagging them, since I wouldn't be routing ambulances with OSM anyway :-) Cheers, Andy _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
