Am Samstag, 19. Januar 2008 21:56:16 schrieb Sven Anders: > Hi, > today from 17:16 UTC to 20:53 UTC OpenGeoDB was imported to OpenStreetMap. > > Please have a look at the newly created data. I hope you enjoy the work. If > there is corrupted data, please reporte soon. I have made a backup and hope > that I could fix it. > > There was a problem with a upload of some relations, so the relation part > is not complete until now. I will fix it soon (=in the next month). > > More Information about the import and comments can be found/added to the > wiki-page: > > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/User:OpenGeoDB > > I want to make more synchronisation between OpenGeoDB and OSM later. > > Best Regards > Sven Anders
Hi Sven! I checked my surroundings (~50.7/7.1) and noticed Bad Honnef, Rheinbach, Königswinter, Alfter, Unkel and Rheinbreitbach being updated by the OpenGeoDB Bot. Wachtberg was newly added and did'nt exist before. :-) The bot also added a placemark for the Rhein-Sieg-Kreis . The city of Bonn now exists twice - the old placemark was updated by the bot and also a new one was created(at the location stored in OpenGeoDB). Both contain OpenGeoDB data, but the data differs(is_in, auto_update...). Meckenheim also has two placemarks now, maybe because OpenGeoDB knows it as "Meckenheim, Rheinland". However, in this case the old placemark called "Meckenheim" remained untouched. I think the official name is just "Meckenheim" and should be kept. What can I do about this(Bonn and Meckenheim) without breaking something? -Martin _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
