Am Sonntag, 20. Januar 2008 13:41 schrieb Rob Reid: > Sven Anders wrote the following on 20/01/2008 09:56: > > Hi, > > today from 17:16 UTC to 20:53 UTC OpenGeoDB was imported to > > OpenStreetMap. > > > > Please have a look at the newly created data. I hope you enjoy the work. > > If there is corrupted data, please reporte soon. I have made a backup and > > hope that I could fix it. > > Just had a look at one of the tiles I was rendering for [EMAIL PROTECTED] > home as I > noticed a lot of place names overlapping. > > The import seems to have created duplicate nodes with differents tag. > > If you have a look in JOSM at : > http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=47.9&lon=13.45&zoom=12&layers=0BFT > Validate picks up a stack of 7 duplicate nodes and another stack of 6 > duplicate nodes. > If you look at the 6 duplicate nodes there is one node named Powang and > 5 named Oberleiten. > If you look at the 5 Oberleiten nodes they have the same place=hamlet > and population=17 tags, but different is_in and OpenGeoDB:postal_codes > tags. > > Is this what you were expecting to happen?
I think you have found "bad" OpenGeoDB data. The Import is correct, when I do: select COUNT(*) from geodb_textdata where text_val="Oberleiten" and text_type=500100000; I got: +----------+ | COUNT(*) | +----------+ | 5 | +----------+ I was not expecting that OpenGeoDB data behaves like this. I will fix this area by hand soon. Best Regards Sven _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
