> I think the data model is the thing that really needs fixing down > properly - the rest is mostly pretty simple rails stuff.
The 'other' go at this has the following suggested fields: http://burghthof.nl/osm/apiinfo.php I would suggest the addition of a longer description field where more of an argument can be added (a note under query could have multiple people adding text to this). Also fields for whether the note has been actioned. Giving: * lat * lon * short note * longer note * email (for requesting more info from submitter) * date * state/stage (new, under review, fully processed) >From looking at kleptog's one it has more of a structure to the feedback, I would suggest that if such options are presented they make up the content of the short note, eg: 'Road - Missing road', 'Poi - Name incorrect'. That way we can have the same data model with different front ends, also makes it easy to add extra options to the list offered. (For reference WhereAmI already feeds data into the burghthof note system - I would hope to be able to move these to the official system for processing). Cheers, Adam. _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
