On 8 Feb 2008, at 11:27, David Earl wrote: > You could do it as a relation. > > The river bank would be a set of ways (each of which shares its end > nodes with the ends of one of the others), and you could have a > role for the one or two ways which close the loop which says "this > is structural, not really part of the river bank". The renderer > would have to assemble the polygon from the constituent ways (start > with one way, find the end node as the start node of another way > and so on), but then rendering would be as per any other polygon. > > It's a bit fiddly, but it removes the problems of the > artificial connections across the water not eing idetifiable while > at the same time still providing a complete polygon (albeit > indirectly) for the renderer to work on.
Yes, this sounds reasonable to me. > > David Artem _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
