Hi, > If we add a thing like segment relations as is proposed, we'll > effectively end up with another level next to points, segments and > relations (since things like route relations will again have these > segment relations contained in them), which will likely increase > complexity a lot in my eyes.
Has anyone actually proposed such a thing? That would indeed be unnecessarily complex. As far as I understand it, the idea is simply to qualify a tag with start and end node. I.e. you have a way that goes from node A, B, C to Z, but from B to D and from M to P it is a pedestrian road. So, old scheme: split way into 5 parts (3 non-pedestrian, 2 pedestrian) and tag accordingly. scheme with "superway" relation: split way into 5 parts and create one relation to contain them all; add all common tags to relation; add pedestrian tag to 2 ways. scheme with "qualified tag" relations: do not split way. create two relations that each contain the way, plus the start and end node (B/D for relation 1 and M/P for relation 2), plus the special tag (pedestrian). Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED] ## N49°00.09' E008°23.33' _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
