Hi,

> The point is that for when part of a road belongs to a route, you'll
> either need to:

[...]

Ah, now I understand.

The main thing that was proposed is using relations for TAGS that are  
not valid for the whole length of a way. This would be modelled using  
a relation but that relation would not become member of anything;  
there would just be a relation saying "for this part of the way, the  
following tag is valid".

You're talking about qualifying not a tag, but a membership - you  
want to say "this way is part of that relation, but only from node A  
to node B". This could indeed lead to the creation of what you call a  
"segment relation". That would itself be a member of the route relation.

Bye
Frederik

-- 
Frederik Ramm  ##  eMail [EMAIL PROTECTED]  ##  N49°00.09' E008°23.33'



_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk

Reply via email to