Both this proposals have the same flaw I pointed out before - you
cannot tag other types of railway systems as incline. So you cannot
have funicular subway or rag light_rail, which of course exists in
reality.
So please include my proposal to voting:
railway=rail | light_rail | tram | subway ...
rack = no (default) | yes | {more specific type} (e.g. Riggenbach, Abt ...)
funicular ( or cable? ) = no | yes | {more specific type} (e.g.
cable_car ...)
Additional tags could be discussed further but I strongly diagree to
mix traction type or steep with "railway" tag, which indicates rail
system.
=TT=
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 8:05 PM, Sven Geggus
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Cartinus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But you don't have to suggest this now. ;) Proposals for both already
> existed
> > in the wiki before Hawke wrote the railway=incline proposal.
>
> So let us break down the different suggestions and go on vor vote
> now?
>
> As far as I can tell, there are two suggestions:
>
> 1.) adding railway=funicular and rag=yes for non funicular incline
> railways
>
> 2.) adding railway=incline and an additional tags for types of incline
> railways (funicular,rag, ...)
>
> others?
>
> Sven
>
> --
> This golden age of communication Means everyone talks at the same time
> (Lyrics of "New Model Army" song "225")
>
>
> /me is [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web
>
> _______________________________________________
>
>
> talk mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
>
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
