Sven Geggus wrote: > > To be serious, I don't like this pseudo object-oriented > railway:incline:traction= stuff at all.
Huh? object oriented? It's like that in order to prevent potential conflicts, not anything to do with object orientation. > As far as rendering is concerned, your proposol states "No rendering changes > required." This ist not true, as incline railways are currently _not_ > rendered at all. Good point. I've updated the proposal. (though of course, rendering incline railways wouldn't be required as such, but that's just semantics) _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
