On Sat, Mar 29, 2008 at 9:39 AM, Andy Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On the basis that we only put data into the project relating to > physical objects I dont think we should put any items in that "might" > get built.
In general I agree, but for some things like highways I think you can make an exception. There's a freeway in the area that's been in the planning for 20 years. The land is cleared, on a satellite image you can see exactly where it will be. In that case I think putting it in as "proposed" is not unreasonable. Basically, if you can see the effects already, it's mappable. This may be prior to the start of construction. Have a nice day, -- Martijn van Oosterhout <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://svana.org/kleptog/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
