Frederik Ramm wrote: > A completely different (and quite OSM-like!) option is dropping all this > complex logic, left-right-blah tagging, number schemes, relations and > all, and just put simple nodes: "This is B street number 25". This > brings redundancy, typos, and all - but we're used to that. It would be > *extremely* easy to edit, and renderers or routers would have to do a > little bit of processing to work with the data. Not too hard probably.
I think this scheme works best, because we can carry it forward to houses being areas tagged 'building=...' -- there's an issue with semi-detached and terraced houses to be worked out (1 way per building vs. 1 way per residence), but that's probably some way off needing to be solved. -- Jonathan _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
