Richard Fairhurst schreef: > Ulf Lamping wrote: > > >> This all sounds you're trying to cure the pain of not using buffered >> editing with adding another concept that will add another layer of >> confusion ... >> > > Fine. I'm really not going to attempt and convince anyone here - one > has to be a bit of a pig-headed UI fascist to develop stuff like > this, otherwise you end up with design by committee which just > doesn't work. > > I think it's good that we offer editors that work in different ways; > that there is more than one answer to the questions of "how's stuff > written to the db and how do I avoid causing damage", although > Potlatch doesn't adequately answer those questions yet; and that > those who are arguing for a "save" button are trying to impose a > model which doesn't suit Potlatch. You and Frederik and doubtless > others disagree - as shown by the fact that you find something > "painful" while I actively prefer it. That's fine, there's no > monopoly on editors. I don't feel it's impossible to have a usable > editor that doesn't work on the "prepare and commit" principle, and > that's what I'm concentrating on building. > Keep up the good work Richard!
Polyglot (who uses both editors; JOSM for initial entering of data/Potlatch for fine tuning afterwards and aligning on Yahoo! imagery) _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
