On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 08:19:52PM -0700, David Muir Sharnoff wrote: > You're right: that OAM imagery is very detailed. Unfortunately, it's > not that good where I'm mapping.
Sorry, my comments were tongue in cheek. I don't expect there to be many cases where OAM is the best choice for mapping. > Richard, can you add the please? Richard is likely limited by the Yahoo! Flash API: I expect that there's a fair chance that Yahoo! hasn't updated their Flash API to provide the new zoom levels that the main API added 2-3 weeks ago (Yahoo added more zoom levels worldwide at that time). (Of course, Richard will tell me if I'm wrong, I'm sure :)) Regards, -- Christopher Schmidt MetaCarta _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
