On 3 May 2008, at 03:40, Christopher Schmidt wrote: > On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 12:51:43PM +1200, Robin Paulson wrote: >> > In the majority of the world, OAM and Yahoo! imagery are the same -- > both based on Landsat. The difference, in those areas, is that OAM > will > display tiles far above "1:1" ratio, as opposed to just giving a 'no > data' message. >
Sure does. > Additionally, I highly doubt you will see anything higher resolution > than > http://openaerialmap.org/map/?lat=37.79202&lon=-122.32715&zoom=21&layers=BF > in Yahoo! anywhere on the planet. > Um looks rather blocky where I am. I'm yet to see OAM that is of decent quality where I am. http://openaerialmap.org/map/?lat=51.40772&lon=-0.06197&zoom=17&layers=BF Shaun _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
