On Thu, May 08, 2008 at 08:42:55AM +1200, Robin Paulson wrote: > 2008/5/8 Christoph Eckert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > For those who think the RFC/vote process represents the > > > consensus on how things should be done, what needs to happen to > > > change that process? > > > > IMO map features should be built on top of tagwatch. This way tagging > > recommendations would be built on top what's actually used. Much more > > democratic than the current process IMO :) .
I agree with that, i think we still need the Proposed_Features just as a reference to clarify ideas and when a tag reaches a significant amount of use in Tagwatch move it to Map_Features. -- Celso González (PerroVerd) http://mitago.net _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
