But what is a significant amount of use? You can't just go on numbers. Based on the posts a month or so back about badly formed tags, there are probably more misspelled versions of the main highway tags than legitimate versions of many other tags.
I would, in fact, think that a well thought out tag that covers some obscure feature that only occurs maybe a thousand times world wide, and is currently only mapped 10 times is equally as valid in Map Features as something that is found every few miles. I want to go to Map Features to look for that odd thing I've found, not have to hunt through Map Features, then try the Proposed Tags as well. Though I'd be happier to do that if somebody could come up with a decent search on the wiki that only looked at the tags pages, not everywhere else that something may have been mentioned, when I'm trying to find what odd tags are being used for whatever I'm looking for. Stephen 2008/5/8 Celso González <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I agree with that, i think we still need the Proposed_Features just as a > reference to clarify ideas and when a tag reaches a significant amount > of use in Tagwatch move it to Map_Features. > _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
