On 12/05/2008 18:06, Inge Wallin wrote: > On Monday 12 May 2008 18:06:59 Chris Morley wrote: > >> Starting with a single level of completeness makes sense, but I think it >> should be public roads, named where feasible. > > I have a different view. I think we should have a leveled scheme from the > beginning. I suggest the following: > > Level 1: All the highways (using OSM lingo) usable by cars within an area are > mapped > Level 2: All highways are mapped and named > Level 3: All highways down to cycleways are mapped (and named if feasible).
That's a very car-centric view of the world. Why "down" to cycleways? Who are you to say something usable by a car is more important than something usable by a bike? David _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk