On Monday 12 May 2008 21:16:38 David Earl wrote: > So I think Inge is right - we need different measures for our own use. > But on the public map, all streets with names seems a pretty good > achievable and useful thing to show.
I don't think it is a good idea to call that just "complete". I think it should be made very clear that it is just the road network that is complete and not the map. With the import of the AND data the road network in the Netherlands is mostly complete. Now we often hear: "Why do you still need to map more? It is complete with the AND data, isn't it?" Having more levels or categories of completeness makes it clear that we are not finished yet after we put the roads in the database. -- m.v.g., Cartinus _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
