On Wed, Jun 04, 2008 at 08:54:53AM +0100, Andy Robinson (blackadder-lists) wrote: > > This brings me to the point though. Currently we map physical features as > they exist and in some cases the alignment of known construction, what we do > not do is use OSM as a planning tool. What are people's views on this?
You can, of course, do what you like, but I'd urge you not to do this without an improvement in the editors. If I come to edit near a junction and find 15 people have sketched out how they see the junction could be improved, that's a lot of ways that don't render that I'm going to have to pick through to find the actual ways and nodes for whatever it is I'm editing. We'd need a way to quickly remove all the virtual ways in order to get through to the valid OSM data. s _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
