Andy Allan wrote: > A) No evidence of the name > B) Evidence of it not having a name > > Doesn't have a sign? Or some authority agrees it actually has no name? > The two are different and should be handled differently, since the
I think one of the principles of OSM is mapping things "as they are on the ground". As such, I would say that those two situations are the same. The latter situation might warrant a "note=Officially called Foo Road" tag or some such. -Alex Mauer "hawke"
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
