Am Mittwoch, 11. Juni 2008 schrieb Richard Fairhurst: > Frank Sautter wrote: > > i agree with you! > > my idea of how this should be rendered is: > > grade1: just like highway=service > > [...] > > It's worth noting that tracktype is not a universally welcome tag - a > lot of people think having an arbitrary scale isn't very "OSM-like", > and that it's better to tag specific characteristics. We don't > necessarily have anything better, of course. >
I agree. In particular it does not reflect the diameter of the stones on the track. Having a track with large "rocks" (as it happens often in the Alps) or very small stones certainly makes a difference when you ride with your bike....Nevertheless the tracktype information is much more useful than just knowing it is a track. Thanks, Rainer -- Rainer Dorsch Lärchenstr. 6 D-72135 Dettenhausen 07157-734133 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG Fingerprint: 5966 C54C 2B3C 42CC 1F4F 8F59 E3A8 C538 7519 141E Full GPG key: http://pgp.mit.edu/ _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk
