>> i agree with you! >> my idea of how this should be rendered is: >> grade1: just like highway=service >> [...]
>It's worth noting that tracktype is not a universally welcome tag - a >lot of people think having an arbitrary scale isn't very "OSM-like", >and that it's better to tag specific characteristics. We don't >necessarily have anything better, of course. There is the optional surface=gravel tag to indicate a gravel surface for a track. A related tag for paths, rather than tracks, is width=narrow. See http://www.free-map.org.uk/freemap/index.php?lat=50.84&lon=-1.42&zoom=14 for some example rendering of tracks/paths of different widths. Everything on there is a permissive bridleway (route accessible to horses, but): the magenta dashed lines enclosed by grey dashed lines are tracks the magenta dashed lines without the grey lines are paths the narrower magenta dotted lines are narrower paths I have chosen not to show gravel tracks differently but it could easily be done. Nick _______________________________________________ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/talk