Chris Hill wrote: > leblatt wrote: >> >> I Consider recycling should be encouraged, and I map a recycling >> point when I come across one. But I find it abnormally tedious to tag >> the type of goods that can be recycled. This information should have >> been made easier to tag. For instance, instead of : >> >> amenity=recycling >> >> recycling:cans=yes >> >> recycling:glass_bottles=yes >> >> recycling_papers=yes >> >> recycling:cardboard=yes >> >> one could write : >> >> amenity=recycling >> >> recycling = cans; glass_bottles; papers; cardboard >> >> Moreover, the tag auto-complete feature in editors would help when >> you find the same combination in several places. >> >> I don’t know how heavily this amenity is being used, and how >> difficult a switch would be, if even possible. Just wondering what >> others think. >> > > It would seem that the tag is well used, there are 9787 > amenity=recycling tags in the db. > There is a fair list of tags along the lines you suggest with about > fifty different tags, including a few misspellings. Popular ones are: > cans, bottles, batteries, clothes, cardborad, glass, glass_bottles, > green_waste metal, magazines, newspaper, paper,plastic, > plastic_bottles,scrap_metal, shoes, white_goods, wood. > > There are a few strange tags too: > amenity=recycling;religion=christian;denomination=catholic. > amenity=recycling;sport=football. > > Cheers, Chris >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
