Lambertus wrote: > Here the dogma 'Don't change the tagging just to get it > rendered' applies :-)
That is an absurd proposition. It could lead us to label them as "vägklassning=riksväg ; vägbredd=9 meter ; hastighet=90 km/h" and we should just ignore the fact that the map of Sweden doesn't get rendered at all. I feel like I have been far too pragmatic in my first three years of OpenStreetMap. > I think it would be better to judge the roads on what their > function is and try to correlate those roads to the map features > page by their description. It's all very easy. The function is "riksväg". > But this may well be that perhaps some ways in Sweden have to be > reclassified to trunk or that some ways in Norway /Finland > should be classified primary, I don't know that. > There is ofcourse also the chance that Sweden just does not have > a road type that fits the trunk type between motorway and > primary, however from what I read in other mails it appears that > cyclists are allowed on most trunk roads in GB. There are non-motorway roads where tractors and bicycles are disallowed. These are called "motortrafikled" (and "2+1 väg") but they are not very common in Sweden. And I don't know if this road type is ever indicated on printed maps. -- Lars Aronsson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Aronsson Datateknik - http://aronsson.se _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
