On Wed, Sep 24, 2008 at 4:28 PM, Steve Chilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Mapnik doesn't recognise dual tags. In this case the area tag takes > precedence. Separate polygon is the way to get it to show. > Isn't that tagging for the renderer? > > Cheers > STEVE > > Steve Chilton, Learning Support Fellow > Manager of e-Learning Academic Development > Centre for Learning and Quality Enhancement > Middlesex University > phone/fax: 020 8411 5355 > email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://www.mdx.ac.uk/schools/hssc/staff/profiles/technical/chiltons.asp > > Chair of the Society of Cartographers: http://www.soc.org.uk/ > > SoC conference 2008: > http://www.abdn.ac.uk/cartographers08/ > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Ed Loach > Sent: 24 September 2008 16:12 > To: 'LeedsTracker'; [email protected] > Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Parking aisle as boundary of car park not > showing > > > The boundary road is marked > > highway=service > > service=parking_aisle > > amenity=parking > > abutters=retail > > Whenever I've mapped car parks I've kept the area defined as > amenity=parking as a separate polygon from any highway=service that > may run around the outside of it. Map Features suggests that > amenity=parking is a tag for nodes and/or areas, and that > highway=service is a tag for ways. That [EMAIL PROTECTED] seems to cope > doesn't necessarily mean that Mapnik can handle the dual tags. > > Ed > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk > > > > _______________________________________________ > talk mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk >
_______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
