Hi, > It would be nice if we could decide on one solution instead of > implementing two competing ones. So, it would be good to have a look at > the advantages and disadvantages of a bugzilla and a rails-port > solution and decide then which one fits best. Perhaps which should also > ask the software developers how they feel about moving from trac to > bugzilla. This seemed to be one of your main points for using bugzilla. I'm not a big developer, but I do try to improve the OSM software stack (mostly [EMAIL PROTECTED] client and maplint) and I get to own all the osmarender bugs in trac. From that perspective I have to say that I really dislike bugzilla and that I was really glad when I found out that OSM uses trac for its bugtracking. Unless we find a REALLY compelling reason to switch I'd stay with trac.
I'd rather have a seperated bugzilla for tracking bugs in the data and a trac for tracking bugs in the software. At that point I should probably add that it would be a good thing if we could migrate all the user databases to one single location and do authentication against that. Patrick "Petschge" Kilian _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
