2009/1/27 Shaun McDonald <[email protected]>: > > On 27 Jan 2009, at 21:45, Brandon Aguirre wrote: > >> Hey all, >> >> I'm tagging cycle infrastructure with the lcn_ref tag but need advice >> since it was developed for Europe where they designate routes >> numerically like a highway system. What do you suggest I put as the >> lcn_ref for various cycle inf. (I put yes as a placeholder but it >> looks so lame) I have the regional bike map and the gov. hasn't >> numbered or named them in any way. Should specify the type of >> infrastructure? >> i.e. >> lcn_ref= bike lane or >> lcn_ref= bike boulevard (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ >> Bicycle_Boulevards) >> > > Just use lcn=yes for local unnumbered/unnamed routes; rcn for regional > and ncn for national. There are some routes that are simply unnumbered/ > unnamed.
If it's just infrastructure then you can also use the cycleway tag. cycleway=lane for a road with cycle lane. Links to some other tags are here http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Bicycle > >> Also, has anyone tagged a bike box? >> (http://www.portlandonline.com/TRANSPORTATION/index.cfm?c=46717 >> ) > > That is what we bits call a cycle advance stop. I've not seen anyone > tag this yet, though I do know of one > One Shaun?! They're on about half of the traffic lights in London! I haven't been tagging them, mostly because they're so ubiquitous around this way, they're frequently ignored anyway, and also because I haven't been tagging traffic lights either. I'd suggest something along the lines of an extra tag on the traffic lights. Dave _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
