> >> Maybe Frederik was saying that the former is okay. My curiousity in that >> case is just if renderers -- especially Mapnik -- will actually support >> these things. (I can't imagine it working for osmarender, but that is >> less concenring to me.) > > The JOSM build-in renderer already supports them, and there is a patch > for Osmarender that does. And with so many bright minds at work on > Mapnik it can only be a question of time until Mapnik supports that kind > of relation as well. (The fact that, for stability, you should not rely > on correct ordering of the relation's members even though 0.6 supports > ordering makes things a *little* more difficult to process, but > requiring correct ordering of editors and mappers would probably > introduce too many errors.)
Mapnik already support this,see: http://openstreetmap.org/browse/relation/24849/ But production osmarender not yet: http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=49.6758&lon=15.9996&zoom=12&layers=0B00FTF What's the problem with osmarender patch? Tomas Tichy _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
