> Well, then there is question: what is worse? > > 1. Have all the data, but risk someone "abusing it"? > 2. Or force the license change, therefore enforcing the share- > alike > rights correctly, but tossing some data away? > > Note that if cc-by-sa is somehow abusable, anybody that want to > abuse > the license using some loophole will simply grab last dump > srill > published under cc-by-sa instead of the new license - and then > abuse > the non-enforcability of cc-by-sa to databases.
As I think someone else pointed out, if it is abusable then we could abuse it and not lose any data with the switch. Ed _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
