2009/3/2 MP <[email protected]>: > On 02/03/2009, Ed Avis <[email protected]> wrote: >> MP <singularita <at> gmail.com> writes: >> >> >As for the people who can't be reached/refused to accept new license - >> >what about tagging such data with some tag like "license=cc_by_sa" to >> >warn people that this part is licensed otherwise and keep the data in >> >database? >> >> >> I don't think that would work. If some parts of the data are CC-BY-SA, and >> some >> parts are under a new licence, then the resulting database )or maps derived >> from > > Well, if you need the data for personal use - you can use them even > with mixed license. If you need to distribute them, etc ... you could > filter the cc-by-sa data out. > > This would allow the remaining cc-by-sa data to be iteratively deleted > and then redrawn under "correct" license. I think this could be > viable, if there would be only small part of such data. (so the period > in which the data won't be properly distributable will be quite small, > perhaps few days till all is redrawn) >
You probably don't mean it that way, but "redrawn" here sounds suspiciously like "copy", which of course you can't do :-) You'd obviously have to redo from scratch, which if there's anything remotely significant would take more than a few days. Dave _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
