> This should be tagged in a different way that uses fact instead of > opinion/fiction. Perhaps by referring to crime statistics for a given > boundary area.
That makes sense, and it might indeed take a separate project to create regional statistics maps as some have said, or to have people rate areas and take a mean (a la that old rotten chestnut "hot or not"). However, since there seems to be a lot of concern over subjectivity, we could also just map "what's on the ground" (or not, as the case may be): chalk outlines and missing bikes, autos, and other stuff. Not nearly as useful as being able to shade a map layer according to perceived danger, though. -P > Cheers > > Andy _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
