Indeed no harm done. But both Andy and I (independently) decided not to even go
into the road, as others had apparently decided earlier! Discretion being
definately the better part of valour in this case.
Incident noted at: http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/Steve%20Chilton/diary/3669
Cheers
STEVE
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] on behalf of Matt Amos
Sent: Mon 3/30/2009 6:33 PM
To: MP
Cc: Talk Openstreetmap
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Tagging dangerous areas
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 5:31 PM, MP <[email protected]> wrote:
>> after the wembley mapping party last year i heard suggestions of a
>> "locals=angry" tag. maybe we should expand that to include
>> "locals=violent" or "locals=heavily_armed"?
>
> What happened at the Wembley mapping party?
andy and steve independently attempted to map the same road on a
council estate but both decided it might not be a wise idea. no
violence was done i think, just evil stares.
andy actually tagged it "locals=angsty", rather than "angry", but
there is a precedent :-)
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/27794700
cheers,
matt
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
_______________________________________________
talk mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
