On Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:58:51 +0200, Tobias Knerr <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I realized that there is an ambiguity with the current (unordered >> definition >> of via) that cannot be solved : If the via includes a loop that must be >> taken for the restriction to be applied. > > Yes, I've thought about loops, too, and I have to agree that they are a > possible situation where order would make a difference. I've yet to see > any real-life examples, but nevertheless I don't really like this. That issue gues away with API0.6 as relations become ordered. Does it? (I don't plan to support via) Marcus _______________________________________________ talk mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
